home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!genesis.demon.co.uk
- From: Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
- Subject: Re: Integral conversion e.t.c. (was: Re: Hungarian notation)
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 96 14:13:29 GMT
- Organization: none
- Message-ID: <823011209snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <SPENCER.96Jan22113215@zorgon.ERA.COM> <TANMOY.96Jan29183041@qcd.lanl.gov>
- Reply-To: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
- X-Mail2News-Path: genesis.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <TANMOY.96Jan29183041@qcd.lanl.gov>
- tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov "Tanmoy Bhattacharya" writes:
-
- >As I said, almost no Posix extension requires diagnostic. It usually
- >specifies meaning for constructs undefined in C.
-
- Unfortunately there are some. For instance POSIX defines fdopen() and
- fileno() in stdio.h. It would have made more sense to put these in unistd.h
- alongsize read, write and close, even though that means defining FILE
- in unistd.h
-
- --
- -----------------------------------------
- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com
- -----------------------------------------
-